I've argued that the issue facing education due to AI is not figuring out what AI means for assessment, or subjects, but what it means to be us? When AI can do a lot of what we do better, ask what can we do better than it? And teach (and be) that. This says that too but with far more articulacy.
Reposted from Maha Bali, PhD
"You can no longer make students do the reading or the writing. So what’s left? Only this: give them work they want to do. And help them want to do it. What, again, is education? The non-coercive rearranging of desire." (Emphasis in original)
archive.ph/PfvmB

Comments

Posting Rules

  • Be respectful to others
  • No spam or self-promotion
  • Stay on topic
  • Follow Bluesky's terms of service