The reply from the person who restored it says that it reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia. I think that's only partly fair. I tried to give a definition, background, categorizations. I mean, its a pretty good start.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
At least no issues with the topic?! I have the prejudices that Wikipedians are overly pro-science or might at least be more cautious with such topics given the edit wars.
Comments
Interesting. So the idea is that they do not like things that might make science look bad? I think of studying QRPs are very pro-science.