Those people also add something about morality being objective and the same for all humans. Completely ignoring the way morality differs with time or location.
Yes, but morality is objective and the same for all humans. Those people in different times and places who behaved differently were wrong.
Or that's how the theory goes. Almost always ignoring that their morality isn't really anything what the people who supposedly spoke for God wrote down.
Moreover that the sort of person who thinks you are only moral if you are religious is the sort of person for whom their religion is an excuse for amorality *at best*. This is especially true of the "born again" crowd.
"God says it's okay for me to hate you because I haven't had a beer this month."
Comments
Or that's how the theory goes. Almost always ignoring that their morality isn't really anything what the people who supposedly spoke for God wrote down.
in reality it's easier to be moral if you're NOT religious
"God says it's okay for me to hate you because I haven't had a beer this month."
Accurate as fuck 👻
Many primates will cheer when a bully is confronted.
Capuchin monkeys use statistical reasoning to divvy up food, which shows they prefer fairness.
Even dogs and cats prefer fair play.