Pascals wager, "if hell exists, you should be Christian so you eliminate the chance of going to hell" assumes a binary.
Same with false info. "Here out THE other side" as if there are no other wrong answers? Infinite religions, infinite wrong answers. Not a lot you can prove true.
Same with false info. "Here out THE other side" as if there are no other wrong answers? Infinite religions, infinite wrong answers. Not a lot you can prove true.
Reposted from
Pij0n
I'm learning that "both sides" talk is usually just a way to prop up one single form of false info to the platform of true info, without acknowledging all other unpopular false info.
You can't account for all of it, so be accountable to none of it.
It's like pascals wager but for information.
You can't account for all of it, so be accountable to none of it.
It's like pascals wager but for information.
Comments