But if it's not a game you enjoyed, is it still a "good game"? Reviews aren't there to be objective, they are explicitly for someone to record their subjective opinion on a game.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
I’m not saying that’s not what they are. I’m saying they should be objective and people should be responsible so we start holding shitty devs accountable and good devs get recognized. We disagree.
There is no such thing as an objective review of art. All reviews or analyses are inherently subjective. You're pursuing an impossible standard with this line of reasoning. You can objective about things like performance, bugs, etc - but not about how a game feels to play, for example.
Comments