By mitigate, I meant watched closely to prevent future harassment or abuse. It shouldn't be on us to regulate his behaviour, but if we are going to use him, we have to take responsibility for his future actions as well.
Willingly putting women in harm’s way because you want to use the harasser politically? Man, politics is morally gross on the whole but that may take the cake.
As we all know, simple close oversight is more than enough to keep serial harassers at bay /s.
I would have been happy to see him go to jail for that, but we didn't do that either. And gods only knows what he could have been up to out of the spotlight of politics since.
I hope we push Adams out with a diferrent, better candidate. But there's nothing wrong with discussing this one.
I don't mind being publicly reminded of how problematic he is. It's part of the discussion that moves everyone forward. Anyone who wants to do better is inevitably going to be compared against his strengths and weaknesses if he throws his hat in the ring. That's good too.
Comments
By mitigate, I meant watched closely to prevent future harassment or abuse. It shouldn't be on us to regulate his behaviour, but if we are going to use him, we have to take responsibility for his future actions as well.
As we all know, simple close oversight is more than enough to keep serial harassers at bay /s.
I hope we push Adams out with a diferrent, better candidate. But there's nothing wrong with discussing this one.