Read my replies elsewhere.
His default stance that "West = bad thus Other = Good" leads him to condemn Ukraine and those seeking to support it, while absolving Putin because "the naughty west expanded NATO and made him do it"
If he spouts Nazi propaganda non-stop, what's the difference?
His default stance that "West = bad thus Other = Good" leads him to condemn Ukraine and those seeking to support it, while absolving Putin because "the naughty west expanded NATO and made him do it"
If he spouts Nazi propaganda non-stop, what's the difference?
Comments
He does so by blaming it entirely on the west and excusing Putin, notwithstanding Putin's prior behaviour in Chechnya, Moldova or Georgia.
If you support a fascist, that means you support fascist policies. Like, you know, annexing a country
I may go on that march in Charlottesville for righteous reasons. While I'm there, I see a lot of people with torches and swastikas marching alongside me.
Should it not dawn on me at that point that, perhaps, I should reconsider my position?
Chomsky is a fool whose hatred of "the west" leads him to the position where he supports an expansionist, militaristic fascist dictator.
He's lost any sense of judgement.
Chomsky is not, himself, a fascist. But because "The West" now opposes a fascist regime, his hatred of "the west" drives him to support said fascist regime.
He is blinded, and thus a Useful Idiot.