Soon to be followed by "Eugenics: was it really that bad? Brave historian speaks out" just-asking-questions and why-are-wokies-so-obsessed style articles that try to normalise this crap
No one, and I mean no one, has called out first and second ave feminists more than third wave feminists. My goodness, what a POS "historian" this person is.
I'm also editing my earlier sentiment. The historian they quoted was taken out of context and her "sometimes" statement was treated as painting all of feminist history. Shameful.
‘Women voters are actually fascist class war lords…” is how they’re trying to lie to us here.
“You thought women cared about being heard equally but all they care about is money & gene editing.” Lies. The telegraph seems full of idiot brainwashing.
"Covered up" 🤣
I thought it was well known, especially as this headline would also cover most news outlets, the king, most aristocracy, and anyone not working class.
Hate to break it to the Telegraph - but eugenics as we know it was a mainstream British invention.
Comments
Not all women in the suffrage movement supported the direct action by the Suffragettes, and this article seems to conflate the two.
“You thought women cared about being heard equally but all they care about is money & gene editing.” Lies. The telegraph seems full of idiot brainwashing.
I thought it was well known, especially as this headline would also cover most news outlets, the king, most aristocracy, and anyone not working class.
Hate to break it to the Telegraph - but eugenics as we know it was a mainstream British invention.
This has been available knowledge all along. Many of them were outspoken about it. It wasn't ever a secret.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/04/why-the-british-union-fascist-movement-appealed-to-so-many-women.html