That's a fair response, since the JMOL is basically a SJ motion made after the case is presented to the jury rather than before. Of course, parties make both motions all the time, but evidence can break down at trial and, in this case, a different judge denied the SJ motion. 3/ - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

profbank.bsky.social • 32 days ago

That's a fair response, since the JMOL is basically a SJ motion made after the case is presented to the jury rather than before. Of course, parties make both motions all the time, but evidence can break down at trial and, in this case, a different judge denied the SJ motion. 3/

Comments

profbank.bsky.social•32 days ago

NASL argues that there was evidence of concerted action (e.g., USSF treated NASL differently on waivers, only began enforcing PLS when NASL needed them, SUM agreement, and Gulati hand-picked the board members). 4/

profbank.bsky.social•32 days ago

Here are a few examples of the evidence on the USSF-MLS relationship from trial that NASL cites 5/

profbank.bsky.social•32 days ago

NASL also notes that its request for a three year runway was denied on the spot by Gulati without a vote, which is a little different than the USSF/MLS version of how this went down 6/

profbank.bsky.social•32 days ago

There's a lot more, but that gives you a taste. The judge can either reject the JMOL completely or grant it with respect to one or more claims (e.g., the D2 claims, but not the D1 claims). 7/7

jaywyk.bsky.social•28 days ago

Hey thanks for sharing you’re smart. Nice meeting you.Your profile caught my attention I wish we could connect as friends. Thanks

helluvatownfc.bsky.social•32 days ago

What is your opinion of the arguments' validity?

Because from what we saw watching the NASL, MLS has their number. The description is perfect.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply