ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
depthsofwikipedia.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
tetrashaded.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
Loving Tom Scott getting quoted on Wikipedia
26
2
reply
[–]
anorcadianabroad.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
Hahaha. A great quote, too!
1
reply
[–]
taaamas.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
I wonder if he knows... he has to, right?
3
1
reply
[–]
tetrashaded.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
I don't know. If @tomscott.com ever decides to come back to this, we'll see what he has to say about the matter.
4
reply
[–]
nlfar15562547.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
reminds me of htcpcp
0
reply
[–]
gayknaves.bsky.social
•
24 days ago
I love standardizations.
0
reply
[–]
ciaramel.bsky.social
•
24 days ago
“objected on technical grounds”
don’t you mean because the British proposed it
0
reply
[–]
tm64g.bsky.social
•
24 days ago
it's like handing in a college assignment and being told that you failed it because you didn't do something that was never mentioned in the brief
i've been there, and it isn't fun
0
reply
[–]
cloakedgames.itch.io
•
25 days ago
I saw the title and remembered the Tom Scott video before I even saw the quote. XD I know so many random cool things because of Tom Scott.
0
reply
[–]
petrichoropossum.bsky.social
•
24 days ago
haha
technical grounds
0
reply
[–]
depthsofwikipedia.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3103#Criticism
69
2
reply
[–]
premiumfrye.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
45 years later and still no standards for making tea or interacting with a coffee pot over HTTP. All we got is faster, more efficient plagiarism machines that are as inconsistent as our hot caffeinated beverages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper_Text_Coffee_Pot_Control_Protocol
12
1
reply
[–]
spiralisland.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
Not entirely true. If your http request somehow reaches a teapot (an IoTeapot if you will) it should send back a 418
8
reply
[–]
astead.bsky.social
•
24 days ago
On the subject of standards, I present: RFC 1149
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers
1
1
reply
[–]
oceanblue-art.bsky.social
•
18 days ago
"bruh I got doxxed by a carrier pigeon"
0
reply
[–]
bleuthoot.svenkl.net
•
25 days ago
And they removed it... Sad.
31
3
reply
[–]
docjade.com
•
24 days ago
I reverted it. <3
0
2
reply
[–]
docjade.com
•
24 days ago
oh... that was an admin edit... am i gonna get banned from wikipedia again
2
reply
[–]
bleuthoot.svenkl.net
•
24 days ago
Do not vandalise the Wiki page. I do agree with the change, how sad it may be that they removed the quote.
0
1
reply
[–]
docjade.com
•
24 days ago
yeah i really didnt think it through, i have reverted the revert... unverted?
0
reply
[–]
twitter.rocks
•
24 days ago
Please tell me the -1,229 is Wiki users disagreeing lol
1
1
reply
[–]
bleuthoot.svenkl.net
•
24 days ago
The number is referring to the amount of characters removed.
Wikipedia shows the amount of characters removed/added per change.
7
reply
[–]
infraredfemboy.bsky.social
•
24 days ago
they just hate fun
9
reply
[–]
doublehelix.bsky.social
•
25 days ago
"The work was the winner of the parodic Ig Nobel Prize for Literature in 1999" 😂
2
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
don’t you mean because the British proposed it
i've been there, and it isn't fun
technical grounds
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper_Text_Coffee_Pot_Control_Protocol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers
Wikipedia shows the amount of characters removed/added per change.