Willis disqualification is hard to make sense of. Court of appeals agrees no financial conflict and no actual conflict. Also says that disqualification very rare remedy for appearance of conflict (dissent says rule is it's never done) but this is the "rare case" in which it's justified.
Comments
Precedent-schmecedent.
Rule of law is for suckers.
It is so awful.
As it so often is.
Not hard to make sense of if you read my posts (on X) about the case from 10 months ago. Illogical to boot SADA but not DA based on same core set of facts.