Is this how traditional scientific articles die?
If you’re using more AI and less normal Google, it means you’re also not visiting the articles that Google links to.
If you’re using more AI and less normal Google, it means you’re also not visiting the articles that Google links to.
Reposted from
PubTech Radar
The launch of Google’s AI-powered search summaries has led to a 19% drop in click-through to academic reference services according to OUP product strategy director John Campbell: www.timeshighereducation.com/news/ai-sear...
Comments
Often the Google AI “answers” are wrong, when you know about the subject or read the first few real articles.
But I assume new science might be the hardest to summarize accurately, just due to the nature of the content?
In fact, depending who’s in “control” of AI, all sorts of misinformation could be intentionally spread.
It wasn’t intentional.
As certain characters get more influence over the world, I am more nervous about their intentions
1. AI food.
2. Hyper-engaging, reproducible data stories that you WANT to read.
#scipub