Lots of hottakes on this case, of course! Here's mine: when the court says 'duty of care' it is being impressitionistic. It does not equate to the same legal concept we use in common law jurisdictions. (I've already noticed several law firm updates neglect to clarify this point, which is vital).
Reposted from
Stephen Bogle
Here is a direct link to The Hague Court of Appeal decision in Shell plc v Foundation for Environment and People: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=E.... I like to review the source itself. Chrome translates automatically.
Comments