LLMs are far, far less carbon-intensive than lots of other leisure activities, especially flying and meat consumption. Cameras aren't exactly easy to make, either -- they come with emissions too.
Regardless, you're 100% dodging the question and completely changing the topic (...which isn't ideal)
Regardless, you're 100% dodging the question and completely changing the topic (...which isn't ideal)
Comments
so do leisure activities
making slop everyone hates doesn't
hope this helped!
You pre-1865, I guess 🤷
(Meatclown bingo: will they respond with pearl clutching claiming an analogy was a direct-parallel? will they pretend the vegans are elevating animal lives over human ones? keep your eyes and ears peeled!)
AI image gen is also a leisure activity, objectively so - people do it for leisure. To argue otherwise is to be so deep into the witch hunt you've abandoned any commitment to sense or truth.
AI is being forced into our phones, our email servers, our google searches. UNASKED
there's plenty of data on the impact of AI models on average energy expenditure.
this feels like arguing about whether climate change is real.
but the AI that exists RIGHT NOW in our currently reality sucks ass. and is doing harm