“If you can afford an American president — Elon Musk spent $290,000,000 on Trump's election — you don't need a tax break.”
If you make $300,000,000 a year, we can tax you appropriately to support the nation and the leader's you're buying — a wealth positive, anti-revolution model of government.
If you make $300,000,000 a year, we can tax you appropriately to support the nation and the leader's you're buying — a wealth positive, anti-revolution model of government.
Comments
Wealthy enough to invest hundreds of millions in politics means your excess capital could be better allocated toward public social stability.
Historically, when wealth concentration reaches a tipping point, societies collapse into upheaval, economic ruin, or revolution.
A rational government taxes wealth appropriately to maintain stability and ensure broad-based prosperity.
If the ultra-wealthy want to keep their empires, they should see fair taxation as a safeguard against the very forces that have historically destroyed unchecked wealth — mass unrest, economic failure, and exploitative systems.
The nation that enables this level of wealth — through infrastructure, laws, a stable currency, and access to global markets — deserves reciprocal investment. The wealthiest contributions ensures the system doesn’t eat itself alive.
Because history tells us that when the wealthiest refuse to invest in stability, the system eventually collapses on them too.
It’s taxes or torches—and one of those options is much better for business.
I know no one will do it. Just saying.