The median age of ADHD diagnosis for men remains 8-12; for women, it’s 35. It’s the result of incomplete criteria and a poor understanding of the diagnostics and best practice. (the gold standard is a methylphenidate test. If one dose calms/focuses you, you have ADHD.)
Reposted from
Eric Michael Garcia
We see a spike in older women getting prescribed with ADHD for the same reason we see the racial gap close with autism. Our understanding of ADHD has grown and therefore, more people who otherwise went undetected are getting the treatment they deserve. This is a plus.
www.nbcnews.com/health/menta...
www.nbcnews.com/health/menta...
Comments
(I know so, so many people who got diagnosed after their kids did.)
We still don’t have good, objective diagnostics, though I think the core muscle tone discovery has the best chance of proving out.
(Here’s one of the very long papers)
Taken together, it tells us the MFNU may be the actual strongest diagnostic we have (and that it’s bio, not psych)
And our diagnostics are still iffy especially for women, since they over-emphasize work/school and undercount the emotional and social aspects, as well as the physical detriments and long-term dangers of untreated ADHD (dementia, Parkinsons)
But product of capitalism.
33 was dx combined audhd.
All made sense why I was struggling so much & my HS that focused more on adhd teaching did so well in for the first time.
There are symptom checklists, and mostly what a neuropsych is doing is hitting those checkboxes. The whole idea of a written screening is poorly implemented, at best.
Pediatrician is where I would start, with one caveat.
https://nichq.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/NICHQ-Vanderbilt-Assessment-Scales.pdf
If it calms her or helps her stay on task, or makes her want a nap? Definitely her doc.
Methylphenidate is the common research drug, too.
Lots of docs also default to Vyvanse, too, which only just came off patent.