Lesson to John Roberts and friends: use clear, explicit, directive language or you will be ignored.
(And even with that, you'll probably be ignored, but without it, you definitely will.)
(And even with that, you'll probably be ignored, but without it, you definitely will.)
Reposted from
Anna Bower
Pam Bondi: “That’s up to El Salvador if they want to return him…If they wanted to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane.”
Nayib Bukele: “How can I return him to the U.S.? Like, I smuggle him into the U.S.?”
No, you put him on the plane the AG just said the US would provide!
Nayib Bukele: “How can I return him to the U.S.? Like, I smuggle him into the U.S.?”
No, you put him on the plane the AG just said the US would provide!
Comments
Deliberate, to keep the GOP zealots on the SC onside with Trump.
I guess we find out who is right in the coming days.
I miss precedented times.
1) Continue to tacitly permit destruction of due process; or
2) Issue a ‘one time only’ (ala Bush v. Gore) specific order and make the destruction at the decision of the president.
No one will speak anything resembling truth. This is a vendor paid for a service. Without any stipulation against torture, cruel and unusual punishment, or up to and including death. With promise of a contract extension for the "home grown."
Find me the most ambiguous term you can to describe "bring him back that can be argued in court ad nauseam until he dies"
Miller: DONE!
Now or never, John.