Sharing uncredited photos isn't much different than posting AI in my opinion. It's still theft with no regard or respect for the creator. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

kellybrenner.bsky.social • 2 days ago

Sharing uncredited photos isn't much different than posting AI in my opinion. It's still theft with no regard or respect for the creator.

Comments

antoinelavoisier.bsky.social•2 days ago

I saw that post and just kinda gave her the benefit of the doubt it was her own photography, but yeah now that you mention it I have seen that Double Boobie pic and it’s not hers

kellybrenner.bsky.social•2 days ago

Yeah and the other clues are the bio makes no mention of photography and there are no other photos of that caliber in the timeline. Those are pro level photos of high quality.

berkeleyeve.bsky.social•1 day ago

🎯 automatic block on my end

jimgmal.bsky.social•2 days ago

As a photographer I agree. As a person who posts images from others I always, always credit the image maker.

northernnerd.bsky.social•2 days ago

Didn't you just do that?

kellybrenner.bsky.social•2 days ago

And I block people who do this just like I block anyone posting GenAI shit.

bluekirby.bsky.social•1 day ago

I've heard the first image is AI too, which makes this even worse

kellybrenner.bsky.social•1 day ago

I was actually wondering if it was! I'm not surprised

jean-no.bsky.social•1 day ago

Respect the creator, hmmmm...

the-episiarch.bsky.social•2 days ago

I also found this post from the same account - posting images from and about a scientific paper without a link to the source/paper is a red mark for me.

Blockity-block

kellybrenner.bsky.social•2 days ago

Ugh with the science/nature grifters.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply