The Supreme Court declined to decide whether a New York law that requires residents to have “good moral character” to carry a handgun is constitutional, leaving in place most of the state’s ban on carrying weapons in “sensitive places,” such as schools, parks and theaters.
Comments
#handsoff 50501 #womensmarch
#fightfascism #fdt #fuckmusk
https://Generalstrikeus.com
@generalstrikeus.bsky.social
Well that's not subjective, is it? Are we in the 1700's?
What it means to me might not equate to what it means to you.
1) Impeachment by Congress, &
2) the 2A by The People.
2A’s not off the table. Politicians in the swamp; the oligarchy in the WH should be verbally reminded of that.
When did i say anything about automatics, bombs, or tanks, anyways?
Eliot Spitzer
Call his office and show him some love! Washington DC office: (202) 225 7508 & Houston office: (713) 383 9234
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1y98FRfsUM
A weapon seller who voted in favor of any and all of the current Fed gov would find any Proud Boy someone of “good moral character”.
And there is no doubt that many weapons sold legally to someone who commits domestic violence …
And the “2nd Amendment Forever!’ crowd, including the NRA et al. will CONTINUE to cheer on the manufacture and sales of ALL weapons for the SOLE purpose of killing other Humans.