What the Bluesky team mean by “your data is your own in #atproto” is different from what the general public would assume.
It only means that you can transfer it somewhere else.
atm there are no measures against AI scrappers and statements only come after pressure and with the “inevitability” tone.
It only means that you can transfer it somewhere else.
atm there are no measures against AI scrappers and statements only come after pressure and with the “inevitability” tone.
Comments
This is how the entire internet works.
Beyond tech solutions: Clearer guidelines against #AI training are useful at least as a legal argument.
“we won’t train it ourselves” is far from enough.
That is the whole basis of all court filings against AI companies.
Tech issues don’t solve themselves only through tech.
It is easier to xerox a book, it is still illegal to sale it (whole/parts) as your own.
“Inevitable” is a classic line from the Uber/Amazon/Facebook/etc “disruptive” playbook.
#Bluesky position on #AI doesn’t show any sign of urgency though their devs say (in accounts) there are #antiAI possibilities by engineering #atproto compartments.
If it doesn’t matter,
Why #Bluesky doesn’t bother to put on more clear guidelines about #AI ?
#noAI creators are already limiting their #OC posts in the “open internet” #atproto - which makes it less alive and therefore an issue to any protocol/ platform.
The rate limit has to be high enough to avoid hampering normal usage, but scrapers don’t need to make an inordinate requests to get the data they want.
https://vercel.com/blog/the-rise-of-the-ai-crawler