Also, the content from Grok cites sources of opposing points of view. I stand by my use of Grok here. It's transparent. The report from Grok provided link to more than a dozen sources that anyone can fact-check and verify.
The weakness of an AI is that it relies on words on internet pages. I am long enough on the internet to know that it's full of bullshit words. I want to see tangible evidence that these organizations and the people inside them walk the talk. I don't see that in the summary provided by the LLM AI.
Comments
That AI seems a lot more reasonable than very many of the people posting here.