Logically possible simply means non contradictory. It doesn’t change contextually. Surely based on that definition you see the folly in applying a framework like that to discussions about the real world we all live in yes?
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
Just to provide an example: it’s logically possible that the earth does not exist. Now we can play in that theoretical, logically possible sandbox as much as you’d like. But what we’d be incorrect to do, is try to extrapolate policy positions on Israel given such a world. Do I need to explain why?
Comments