My colleague @stevevladeck.bsky.social points out the contrast between Samual Alito's dissent this morning supporting presidential autonomy from courts and his dissent in 2022 when Biden was president, arguing courts could dictate immigration enforcement. https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/129-untangling-the-foreign-aid-ruling
Comments
In a healthy court, majority and dissenting opinions are shared somewhat as part of persuasion process and to enable the Court’s opinions to evolve for greater clarity. Robert’s Court isn’t healthy
Ball and strikes, indeed.