this is a bad article—for one, CEOs of private services, cops, church reps, and condo owners are inappropriately the only
sources—and when it veers into interpretation it leaves out important histories of exclusion & conflates a single opioid with wide-ranging social issues
https://bsky.app/profile/theglobeandmail.com/post/3lpw423zd7y2k
sources—and when it veers into interpretation it leaves out important histories of exclusion & conflates a single opioid with wide-ranging social issues
https://bsky.app/profile/theglobeandmail.com/post/3lpw423zd7y2k
Reposted from
The Globe and Mail
Comments
its this disgustingly sociopathic framing. "the dying people are ANNOYING and they made a MESS"
this file is a scandal and the media is "ten percent less death, is that good? can we lock the rest of them up"
meanwhile
https://bsky.app/profile/kwardvancouver.bsky.social/post/3lpwgjfo7i22a
Though I’m surprised they waited so long before they mentioned involuntary forced treatment. Always demonizing the addict as a problem to be dealt with and not as a fellow human being.
These are your neighbors, co-workers or friends from school.
https://bsky.app/profile/davethompsonvic.bsky.social/post/3lpwkja3w4c2z