A misleading slide shown at QIP2025.
The surface code number is 10x too high (should be 0.1% not 1%; see fig 1c of https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13687) and the tesseract number omits the worst 18% of shots (see table III of https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04628).
The surface code number is 10x too high (should be 0.1% not 1%; see fig 1c of https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13687) and the tesseract number omits the worst 18% of shots (see table III of https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04628).
Comments