THE CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THAT THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS IS CONDITIONAL ON THE JUSTICIABLE QUESTION WHETHER A WELL-REGULATED MILITIA IS NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE AND SCOTUS SHOULD CALL FOR ARGUMENTS ON THAT QUESTION.
Reposted from Meredith Rose
LAWSKY, GIMME YOUR ALL-CAPS LEGAL HOT TAKE

I'LL START: WARHOL WAS NOT BAD, ACTUALLY, BECAUSE IT MORE CLOSELY ALIGNED FAIR USE ANALYSIS WITH ENTIRELY REASONABLE POPULAR BELIEFS ABOUT COPYRIGHT LAW

Comments

Posting Rules

  • Be respectful to others
  • No spam or self-promotion
  • Stay on topic
  • Follow Bluesky's terms of service