I would if it meant we would be still be alive or have some freedom. If I had to seek refuge from death or trafficking or slavery. Yes. I would carry them on my back across 5 nations seeking a humane life.
No asylum is granted to refugees in CREDIBLE fear of death or persecution at the hands of your own government. “Seeking a better life” makes one an economic migrant, not a refugee eligible for asylum. Also, you’re supposed to go to the next safe country, not all the way to USA.
It’s not bc nobody outside Venezuela is gonna send you back if they catch you. You could stop in Brazil or Argentina which have safe harbor laws. That’s why the Nazis all retired in Argentina.
sooo we went from immigrants fleeing for safety being on the same level as “taking your kids to sell drugs with guns in the car..?” speaking of guns… 🇺🇸
I’m giving you an example of what is a federal crime and would you commit a federal crime with your kids in the car and if you wouldn’t do it with guns and drugs then why would you do it with hopping in the border?
well said. the parents decision comes with risk, and that risk was for the chance of a better upbringing for the child. that child should not be punished.
no you’ve lost it because crossing the border is done so for the chance of a better life. the example you dragged out the dirt is “guns and drugs” . of course they’re both offences, but one is with the intention of violence and the other for safety. see my point?
Comments