Like I said, an actual doctor. Someone with actual training to make the decisions. This means backing it up with science, not arbitrary sentiments. This means studying actual results and actual data. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

pachilles.bsky.social • 5 days ago

Like I said, an actual doctor.
Someone with actual training to make the decisions.
This means backing it up with science, not arbitrary sentiments.
This means studying actual results and actual data.

Comments

profadam.bsky.social•5 days ago

Ok, great. So if RFK has an actual doctor make the assessment, citing peer reviewed published papers with statistically significant results, you will support the assessment?

pachilles.bsky.social•5 days ago

If the doctor, or team of doctors, were to state their findings, I would not likely have any issues with their results.

profadam.bsky.social•5 days ago

That's great. So when another doctor or doctors disagree with the first set, who will you choose to believe?

We live in a world with Einstein and Dr Oz after all.

pachilles.bsky.social•5 days ago

The ones that have the most background, study, or experience on the particular topic.

profadam.bsky.social•5 days ago

And so you will read the resumes of the teams of doctors on both sides and have the medical knowledge to decide which of them is superior?

C'mon. You're gonna agree with anything the left side decides and disagree with anything the right side decides. Or it's a total coincidence you answered Fauci?

pachilles.bsky.social•5 days ago

You don't have to be knowledgeable to recognize the specific medical knowledge people have studied.
Yeah, I'll lean toward the Left, but only because they are known to be more scientific than the Right. However, I take everything on a case-by-case basis.
RFK Jr is particularly uneducated in medicine

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply