I'm not a lawyer and I went "Whaaaaaaaaa!?" so many times. This is absolutely hilarious and bad, like REAL bad. Can't wait for @questauthority.bsky.social and @kenwhite.bsky.social 's reactions.🤣
Reposted from
Judge Roy Ferguson
I asked ChatGPT to brief "Trust Me v. Bro," a nonexistent case I used in response to a claim that items/information publicly released by the media is inadmissible at trial for some reason, and of course GPT was quick with the full cite and (glorious) synopsis: Trust Me v. Bro, 999 U.S. 867 (2024).
Comments
https://www.seyfarth.com/news-insights/use-of-chatgpt-in-federal-litigation-holds-lessons-for-lawyers-and-non-lawyers-everywhere.html
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I get wary of using it for subject matter that I can’t easily verify/stress test
IME, it works best with micro increments (a pipeline job) vs the macro (whole CI/CD pipeline)
My problem was that I didn't know how to handle the basis of the problem. I think the writing of the prompt served more as the proverbial goldfish than anything else.
they give the cite so i can help them locate it, it's a different case.
i ask them where they got the case and they answer: ChatGPT