Another #ActionResearch example, this time combined with #coproduction
Kidd et al. (2015) Exploring the meaning of recovery-oriented care: An action-research study
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/inm.12095
Kidd et al. (2015) Exploring the meaning of recovery-oriented care: An action-research study
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/inm.12095
Comments
Mirkovic et al. (2018) Developing Technology to Mobilize Personal Strengths in People with Chronic Illness: Positive Codesign Approach.
https://formative.jmir.org/2018/1/e10774/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/03091902.2015.1088092#abstract
@dr-know.bsky.social et al. (2017) Empowering people to help speak up about safety in primary care
(whoops - deleted this mistake. I'm new here)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hex.12648
Breault et al. (2018) People with lived experience (PWLE) of depression - using #codesign and #PPIE
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-018-0115-1
With so many different approaches to #coproduction and #codesign, our first challenge was identifying which articles to analyse.
A question for you - when does qualitative research (e.g. a focus group) become participatory research? When does it become #coproduction?
What is authentic?
@dr-know.bsky.social et al (2021) -authentic engagement is a result of ‘space to talk’ and ‘space to change’
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-021-00262-5
Dunston et al (2009) - #coproduction requires a dialogic & learning process