This is a really good way of looking at art -- "The conversational partner changed" is SUCH a good way of phrasing how I personally see art/writing/music/etc.
Original post: https://www.tumblr.com/shinesurge/775217197104644096?source=share
Original post: https://www.tumblr.com/shinesurge/775217197104644096?source=share
Comments
But if I was young I would be using them in the same way I used HTML to make bad looking websites about star trek. And in 10-15 years it would be a skill in tool box.
Or a less extreme example: when someone told you they baked you a nice pie, but then you find out it's a store-bought factory-made pie full of artificial ingredients.
Choices that were made.
The image recombinators remove that. Remove even that layer beyond surface.
No wonder ai slop is embraced by fash.
But I'd similarly be upset if someone said this was an physical painting but they really assembled it on their iPad and printed it out.
Just like why I dislike GMOs: Disease resistance and extra nutrients? Sure! Herbicides? No!
I talked to the writer a few years ago about the song and how it inspired me, but then he was confused saying that “how? this song was written how much I hate you people”.
Blocked him and his songs after.
Yeah, I did like that art/movie/book/music, but I can't enjoy it anymore because now it has a giant asterisk next to it that won't go away.
genAI "solves" the goal of creating the asset by cutting out the entire artistic aspect of doing so
genAI images are just empty assets without the art
Realizin' that the piece you read/watched/heard/played had no literal thought put into it (just a series of random inputs,) or was made by a shit person, makes such conversations one-sided.
Without worth.