Part of the reason that Rachael Reeves and her party get such "reasonable" treatment from BBC News. Without his approval, not a word can be published. And he gets paid 220,000 for his choices. - ThreadSky

maxbrockbank.com • 8 days ago

Part of the reason that Rachael Reeves and her party get such "reasonable" treatment from BBC News.

Without his approval, not a word can be published.

And he gets paid 220,000 for his choices.

Comments

marcdeb.bsky.social•8 days ago

Labour don't reasonable treatment from the tory run BBC.
This guy has only just started and only got the job because he's a right wingers like all the BBC management. Kuenssberg, Robinson and Bruce are tories,
Berg and Gibb are right wing Zionists

mistlethrushb.bsky.social•8 days ago

Not forgetting Mason and Zeffman.

ktmartin.bsky.social•8 days ago

Paid by us. Fantastic.

McAndrews used to work with GB News, with Andrew Neil and Burley at Sky News.

No wonder BBC news is doing so well these days.

rebusknebus.bsky.social•7 days ago

All but two of the BBC board were appointed by Blobba Job Johnson, #UselessNandy needs to feel some heat

adrianlenard.bsky.social•7 days ago

Why isn’t Labour doing anything about that, do you think? The BBC seems relentlessly hostile to Labour, who don’t seem to be calling it out at all…

rebusknebus.bsky.social•7 days ago

Not sure, if they want another term in government (looking less likely as the days pass) the media, but particularly the BBC, has to be dealt with, otherwise nothing they do will be fairly reported.

durotrig.bsky.social•7 days ago

Indeed Brexit fan #UselessNandy is utterly useless.

always-boots.bsky.social•7 days ago

And he himself is STILL taking a good wedge from the dubious influences behind Gbeebies.

No real surprises here, there are no impartial bosses at the BBC now, kiss goodbye to the World Service