Before things heat up
I want to be very clear to those who only just started paying attention to pseudoarchaeology
They've been targeting archaeologists for harassment well before I debated Graham Hancock
/1
I want to be very clear to those who only just started paying attention to pseudoarchaeology
They've been targeting archaeologists for harassment well before I debated Graham Hancock
/1
Comments
The few that I have were polite and not insistent so I left them alone unblocked
I doubt it will stay that way, but I'm too busy to collect a list. I'll just block and move on
Hancock published the email of a staff member for Ohio History Connection at Serpent Mound because they'd rejected a filming request
/2
The Gobekli Tepe team have been swarmed by pseudoarchaeology fans for over a decade. Just ask @jensnotroff.com or other people who have worked there
/3
If you EVER need someone who isn't scared of confrontation to speak up on your behalf just tell me when and where. I'm so fucking sick of the bullshit that Rogan and his guests promote.
And their caretakers and stakeholders too
The stories of these sites are twisted in a way that diminished the accomplishment of those responsible
/4
They often break the law. Hancock brags about bribing guards at Giza so he could climb pyramids. YouTubers get wealthy by publishing drone footage they got from trespassing
/5
Stand up guys..
🤣🤣🤣
Respond or don't. Document it or don't
Doesn't matter. These beliefs are tied up in identity and passions and habitus. They will target us
Support and solidarity
/End
Don't feed the beast. That's what I've learned from it.
Most people aren't moved by these personal attacks or attacks on his fans.
If anything, they weaken your argument because people see it as a smear campaign and then tune out.
It's been a tactic to silence people, so when they see it happening to Hancock, they (wrongly) assume it's because he's onto something.