It is customary for the expert report to be made available to the opposing party during the court proceedings. However, it is "very unlikely that this will be the case in the short term", say the legal experts.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
The Office for the Protection of the Constitution had justified its assessment of the AfD as definitely right-wing extremist with "the extremist character of the party as a whole, which disregards human dignity".
Two issues where it matters to pay attention now
1️⃣ According to Florian Meinel (Professor of Constitutional Theory, Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law, Uni Göttingen)
▶️ one might consider that the AfD's announced legal action against the decision of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution to categorise the party as right-wing extremist is "rather futile".
▶️ In its decision, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution had closely followed the guidelines of the Higher Administrative Court of North Rhine-Westphalia and the criteria of the Federal Constitutional Court for the second NPD decision regarding hostility to the constitution.
▶️ Furthermore, the so-called party privilege means that no sanctions may be imposed below the threshold of a party ban.
▶️ The upgrade therefore has no influence, for example, on the question of whether the AfD will appoint committee chairs in future.
Comments
1️⃣ According to Florian Meinel (Professor of Constitutional Theory, Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law, Uni Göttingen)
▶️ The upgrade therefore has no influence, for example, on the question of whether the AfD will appoint committee chairs in future.