Of course not.
In the case of FB, YT, X, BS, etc., they “stock” millions of “books” per day, and their “recommendations” are human-free, just matching keywords/tags. If you think this somehow makes them more liable than a human who made a knowing decision to say “read this!”, I dunno what to say.
In the case of FB, YT, X, BS, etc., they “stock” millions of “books” per day, and their “recommendations” are human-free, just matching keywords/tags. If you think this somehow makes them more liable than a human who made a knowing decision to say “read this!”, I dunno what to say.
Comments
1/
In the unlikely even the content is actually illegal, then, if you’re explicitly informed, you remove it. But very little content is illegal. Speech must be found to be defamatory by a court. A simple claim is not generally sifficient to claim liabilit.y.
Has anyone been arrested for their book, podcast, video, or t-shirt saying “Take horse dewormer!”
If it’s not illegal to *produce* the speech, how is it illegal to host it or recommend it?
It’s *immoral*, amd the response should be pushback, criticism, and boycotts.