uhm you know i shouldve asked specifics when everyone was talking about it. undercosted was one bit. and recurring instant speed +4/0 and flying that stays on the field i think. but youre right equipment is a lil more vulnerable and is nerfed in that way - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

hypercubespl.bsky.social • 157 days ago

uhm you know i shouldve asked specifics when everyone was talking about it. undercosted was one bit. and recurring instant speed +4/0 and flying that stays on the field i think. but youre right equipment is a lil more vulnerable and is nerfed in that way

Comments

somesingman.bsky.social•157 days ago

Hrm… I guess that’s true in that most equipment doesn’t do so much for so cheap. Higher equip cost would make sense? But essentially you have to constantly pay 2 mana a turn to equip on a creature that can be destroyed. Doesn’t sound that OP to me. Maybe it’d be OP in draft, but that’s about it haha

somesingman.bsky.social•157 days ago

If concerned about it being too strong, you can do 2 mana equip. 3 mana to cast. Otherwise, still has lots of vulnerabilities. 1: have to have a creature, 2: doesn’t give your creature protection, 3: it costs a lot of mana to cast and add onto creatures each turn. Hard to see why it’d be OP.

hypercubespl.bsky.social•156 days ago

yeah see i thought i balanced it by making it unequip every turn so i thought that was fair to have it cost slightly less than regular equip cost? but everyone at riptide was like "this is broken!!" and im like "i guess it IS kinda cheap..."

somesingman.bsky.social•156 days ago

Haha. I suppose it depends on the matchup in the end. Because equipment without a creature is useless. But 1 mana equip is pretty cheap ngl. A lot of strong artifacts are usually 3 or 4 cost mana. And 3 to equip. No special ability or additional survivability doesn’t make it OP to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply