Reposted from
Allan Lloyds
'"most readable" language in era of AI-generated code'
Hadn't considered this before - I guess it's partly in the eye of the beholder, but is there anything definitive we can say about this? e.g. are some languages provably less prone to errors and better structured via AI generation?
Hadn't considered this before - I guess it's partly in the eye of the beholder, but is there anything definitive we can say about this? e.g. are some languages provably less prone to errors and better structured via AI generation?
Comments
On the other hand, Ruby grammar is not the simplest one - could it be prone to more hallucinations than other langs?
Claude itself suggests minimal boilerplate, readable syntax, high semantic density & static typing may be best.
We could gain another PR win for Ruby 😎