I genuinely wonder about this. How is it that so many people who profess to abide by a text can vote for a man who epitomises everything that text abhors, while so many who do not follow that text vote against him for the very reasons the text gives? It's. So. Weird.
Religious texts can be interpreted to mean whatever you like. All religious-based arguments about what is good and what is bad are essentially circular arguments.
And he doesn't give a damn about them. He told them that at a rally. He said"I don't care about you I just want your vote." Suckers. All of them. They FA and now they will FO.
Comments