An inaccurate newspaper report that was followed up at prime minister’s questions two weeks ago has resulted in “extraordinarily serious security threats” to judges, the lady chief justice of England and Wales told the Lords constitution committee yesterday.
https://rozenberg.substack.com/p/press-endangers-judges
https://rozenberg.substack.com/p/press-endangers-judges
Comments
That’s exactly what is being said.
You’re pushing a campaign that PM abused a judge by saying he disagreed with a decision.
Rise of far right, inc. attacks on judiciary, will not be stopped by “faults on both sides” arguments.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpdx0yn6v7lo
I disagree with Starmer’s call to do so, so I’m not going to defend it.
If there’s a loophole:
- Parliament is supposed to fix it
- blaming loophole not the judge is exact opposite of abusing the judge following the law.
The Nazis are back - and the judiciary is still whining about Parliament stepping in over the Post Office.
Yes, it’s whining. Enough people had died to say the system wasn’t working fast enough. The very fact there was a death toll should be enough for you.
The Horizon prosecutions were a massive miscarriage of justice. I didn't read anything in the judge's comments here except a >