The choice was no genocide, a choice the Dems could have very easily enacted, but chose not to, and it cost them the election. The way you see it, is that the lives of Palestinians were expendable.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
Don't do that.
Voting for dems didn't end the genocide and not voting for them didn't end the genocide as a voter you were denied that option.
In a two party system your actions either serve one party or the other. And one was the most publicly broadcast fascist playbook in history
Both parties ultimately care only about the ruling class and empire, they are not different. In a democracy, if a party and candidate wants votes, they have to earn them. The option was no genocide, the Dems chose not to take that one, and lost. They could have conceded to voters, but lost instead.
Comments
Voting for dems didn't end the genocide and not voting for them didn't end the genocide as a voter you were denied that option.
In a two party system your actions either serve one party or the other. And one was the most publicly broadcast fascist playbook in history