It seems you can only have one train of thought so it is the only logical conclusion I can come to based on your responses. If you had condemned the violence, I might have come to a different conclusion. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

cocoamelons.bsky.social • 13 days ago

It seems you can only have one train of thought so it is the only logical conclusion I can come to based on your responses.

If you had condemned the violence, I might have come to a different conclusion.

Comments

libraryguy.bsky.social•13 days ago

Your logical conclusion is that I believe something I've never even insinuated in the first place? I neither condemned nor endorsed any form of violence so all you're doing is jumping to conclusions and changing the subject. That's not logic.

cocoamelons.bsky.social•13 days ago

I guess it's ok for you to jump to conclusions though.

It's a game you like to play with people you disagree with. I'm just jumping to the end where you show your cards.

libraryguy.bsky.social•13 days ago

I'm staying on topic. You're trying to turn this into something it's not.

cocoamelons.bsky.social•13 days ago

I am against the violent protests. It's that simple. You seem to think I can't be against the violence because I was being sarcastic about that fact that it has turned violent and people seem to think there's nothing wrong with the violence.

You have not condoned the violence.

libraryguy.bsky.social•13 days ago

You're not very good at following this if you think that's what I think.

No, I think no one should listen to your criticisms of how people protest if you disagree with the very concept of the protest. I think it's disingenuous to criticize the way they protest if you don't even support their ideas

cocoamelons.bsky.social•13 days ago

If anyone thinks this is the right way to protest, you can fvck right off.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply