No conspiracy, no collusion, it’s just a bias. The ball clearly hit the ground and should have been incomplete. Allen clearly made the first down. But somehow it was “not clear enough” to overturn even though the evidence was right there.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
I’m a fan of a good team. I didn’t go into the game expecting a bias. That’s not what happened here at all. Watch the replays man. The ball hit the ground. Allen got the first down.
A ball can touch the ground and be a catch if it's controlled and doesn't move. If you're going to complain about a bias, you should at least know the rules.
Hand on the ball doesn’t mean control. He didn’t control the ball until after the ball hit the ground. The ball can only hit the round if the receiver has 100% control. The ground cannot assist the catch at all, as it did there.
Comments
A ball can touch the ground and be a catch if it's controlled and doesn't move. If you're going to complain about a bias, you should at least know the rules.