How exactly was the NFL on the side of the Pats when they docked them for Spygate and Deflategate? I disliked the Pats but you couldn’t accuse the league of playing favorites for them at that time. I don’t think you are recalling correctly.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
And yet there were a crap ton of conspiracies about how they were favored. Though using your logic, if they didn't want them there, why didn't they just ask the refs to be a bit biased?
You aren’t following what I’m saying. There is no conspiracy. There is no collusion. No one is asking anyone to do anything. In close calls, the Chiefs get all the breaks because of some sort of referee bias. Is there a significant close call from this season that went against the Chiefs?
What does that matter? The results are clear that it happens over and over again. We should ignore the results because we don’t have a brain scanner? If I have a running nose, I don’t need to the precise virus to tell me I have a cold.
I’m not assuming anything. I think bias could be at play based on the two replay reviews (which we disagree) and the RTP calls from last week. That’s the cold. However, I can’t look into anyone’s brain, so I can’t tell if bias is actually there (virus). Since we disagree on the calls we won’t agree.
Comments
Even in your example, the runny nose. You have a cause. The cold. You just think bias exist out of thin air.