probably because said people would logically vote for the party that they agree with the most... not voting just because you dont fully 100% agree with either party is just stupid because you couldve used your vote to at least make it so the least bad party has a better chance
Comments
Is like choosing between a guy who bombs your family and points a gun at you, and the other guy
The Israel Palestine conflict didn't start on October 7th.
If it did then of course Israel should be supported to far measures
Also, if you think all that the dems did is bad, then I don't know how you couldn't see the candidate who was using 'Palestinian' as a slur doing any better
-weapons and bombs
-billions of dollars
-shielding against UN sanctions
-shielding against ICC sanctions
-full support in bombing civilians, hospitals, refugee camps, etc
-full support in blocking aid to palestinians.
Biden. And the dems? Not a word.
My point is pretty simple, in a two party system, voting for the lesser of two evils is smartest choice.
Cause why would you let more evil happen?
I don't think things are going to get any better now that "the more evil" won.
They was no lesser evil.
You got guys who when people were pleading for help said “shut up!! 4 more years, 4 more years!!”
You beat them up, bomb their families, starve them to death, and say “hey, vote for us”
You gave them no choice. No lesser evil
The apartheid and other genocides done by Israel has been since 1948.
But the dems actions in this 13 months cost them the election.
Thats the topic here 🙄
I enter your house, kill half of your family, tie the rest and put a gun on your head.
Then I ask you to choose between me and the guy who is outside BUT still hasnt done anything yet.
Who would you choose?
Do you get it now?
Thats not a choice
Choose between I, who is killing your family in front of your eyes, or the guy outside telling you he is going to kill you too.
Tell me who is the lesser evil right now.
The answer is None.
There is no choice.
Thats what you dont get it.