I dunno to whom you're referring but it reminded me of Kamala harris and how she collected one BILLION dollars and then just gave up and let Trumpuskutin take over the country...
Conceded the fastest in american history just to "take the high road", but it seems more like took the money and ran!!!
it's weird how they just stopped using their strongest weapon all of a sudden without reason!
Calling them weird was gonna be a winner, i agree. What really happened was what nobody but me has the guts to say: they pocketed 1 billion from donors and the election wasnt important anymore to them.
Truly it was. The Dems backing the IDF was easily the worst move they ever made as it alienated the Pro-Palestine voterbase. With that being said, I would've rather had her over the Mandarin Megalomaniac.
Dems have backed the IDF for decades because US foreign policy on the Middle East is bi-partisan and they will never take a stand and upset their pro-Israel donors. They naively gambled that the genocide in Gaza wouldn't be a factor to voters and then kept their head in the sand after they lost.
/1
Democrats thinking it's still 1995 without understanding that Dem voters no longer just get their news filtered from MSNBC or CNN. They can now witness the atrocities uncensored online.
A much harder stance on Israel would've greatly benefited Harris but they can't do it.
And Bibi knows this. Strategically used it on Biden and Dems. In fact this has been in his playbook since the Clinton administration. It's Win-Win for them. Push the limit and play hard ball with Dems in power and expect zero push-back. Get away with everything under Repubs in power.
If I recall, he was saying that to Data who believed he had played a perfect game but actually failed to take the meta-game into account, after which point he was able to win.
So yeah, sometimes shit happens. But sometimes you just don't realize you're not seeing the entire picture.
I'm pretty sure he's talking about like, a board game, or some spaceship junk. Not losing an election to a convicted felon/second least popular president in history
Still true though. It is in fact possible to commit no errors and still lose. Yup, true. You can ascribe whatever virtue to a situation you’d like. I’m not here projecting values. Just making an observation.
so like,,, to be absolutely clear, you just posted a picard meme under a post about how Kamala's campaign failed for absolutely no reason, to make no point at all except to point out that it is theoretically possible, in the abstract, to run a perfect campaign and lose?
In the context of the election, Kamala made nothing but missteps after it was looking like she was gonna win the election. She seemed to have realized she was actually popular and veered hardcore to the right almost exclusively
Yes because there are only like 3 choices you can make in that board game, and only one winner, so it is almost guaranteed that you will make no mistakes and still lose anyway
Well no, because Kamala already played in the big leagues.
Anyone posting on social media about how to run a campaign is the one doing armchair quarterbacking
Or it points out that so many voters and non-voters don't see it as their responsibility to be engaged, informed participants in our democracy.
Harris did a fine job. A lot of lazy ppl didn't pay attention, a lot of gullible ppl were misinformed, and a lot of idiots ignored the threat of Trump.
She promised to implement republican border policy and include them in her cabinet, distanced herself from the left while keeping herself aligned to a historically unpopular sitting president actively aiding in genocide.
"keeping herself aligned to a historically unpopular sitting president"
She was his vice president. Would it have been a better strategy for her to join the GOP attacks claiming that Biden's administration was an absolute disaster?
And why was Biden so "historically unpopular" in the first place?
Comments
Conceded the fastest in american history just to "take the high road", but it seems more like took the money and ran!!!
They threw harder than the Falcons.
Calling them weird was gonna be a winner, i agree. What really happened was what nobody but me has the guts to say: they pocketed 1 billion from donors and the election wasnt important anymore to them.
How are you doing?
I feel offended actually
/1
A much harder stance on Israel would've greatly benefited Harris but they can't do it.
/2
/3
So yeah, sometimes shit happens. But sometimes you just don't realize you're not seeing the entire picture.
Like, when he said "that's life", he was referring to this?
Anyone posting on social media about how to run a campaign is the one doing armchair quarterbacking
Harris did a fine job. A lot of lazy ppl didn't pay attention, a lot of gullible ppl were misinformed, and a lot of idiots ignored the threat of Trump.
Kamala: "We will do nothing to help people, also we're cozying up to the right!"
You: "But why didn't the voters vote?"
I'm pretty tired of people acting like it's a choice over who is perfect rather than who is obviously better.
Basically perfect campaign.
What more could she do?
Hell, I voted kamala despite:
1) I live in Texas and it literally didn't matter
2) She ran a dogshit campaign
This is about the dems punting easy wins to republicans by running as diet republican.
Trump's campaign was garbage but he at least played to his base and promised change.
Kamala ran an objectively bad campaign that focused on bipartisanship and winning over moderate republican votes, which simply do not exist.
She was his vice president. Would it have been a better strategy for her to join the GOP attacks claiming that Biden's administration was an absolute disaster?
And why was Biden so "historically unpopular" in the first place?
You tell people the economy is good while constantly increasing homelessness and people being unable to afford all the necessities of living.