I draw lots of male only and gay art, some people follow me for that. People should be informed about what they're opting in to see, it makes sense if you're someone like me who draws a wide variety of stuff
Purely a personal opinion here, & not a criticism of you, but if people can't handle seeing the nude female body to where they need a CW for it but they're fine with male art, that says a lot of uncomplimentary things about them that probably doesn't deserve being catered to
I'm as pansexual as they come (obvs, I'm drawing this stuff) but I understand that what I'm drawing is pornography and people have preferences on what they wanna expose themselves to
Is it the fact it's a CW that people are bothered by? Like if I just wrote it as "content" it would be fine? :p
I've seen way too many gay men go "eww vagina" or some variation thereof any time porn that isn't strictly cis-male in nature gets shown in their spaces. It's childish & sexist. That's the only reason I've ever seen someone ask for a CW on female porn.
So in my mind, it implies that the female body is something specially objectionable that requires a content warning so fragile misogynist people don't have to look at it. That's probably not your intention, & I'm not saying it is. But that's how it comes across based on my lived experience.
Comments
I prefer females but as other commenters say, it's a bit odd if females need a content warning but not males. Just left me slightly confused.
Though I am pretty dense and oblivious to social stuff.
Is it the fact it's a CW that people are bothered by? Like if I just wrote it as "content" it would be fine? :p
I've seen way too many gay men go "eww vagina" or some variation thereof any time porn that isn't strictly cis-male in nature gets shown in their spaces. It's childish & sexist. That's the only reason I've ever seen someone ask for a CW on female porn.