That's why this speech is strange.
For me: either the #European politician is lying or the American on the phone call was lying. Or BOTH
It's just my apriori
It is strange though, that it echoes the desiderata of #trump and #putin
Who is this european politician? A guy from #RIGHT / #FARRIGHT ?
For me: either the #European politician is lying or the American on the phone call was lying. Or BOTH
It's just my apriori
It is strange though, that it echoes the desiderata of #trump and #putin
Who is this european politician? A guy from #RIGHT / #FARRIGHT ?
Comments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RNE3X41IvM&t=693s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Sachs
I think you should mention YOUR position and HIS position on the
#Budapest Memorandum
Because I'm pretty sure you have NOT mentioned it yet, and I am REALLY puzzled by this #FACT ... do you understand my position?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
Vladimir Putin also said that #Chechnya was #Islamist:
So when Vladimir Putin says US told that NATO would not expand: I think he PURPOSEFULLY omit the fact that it's a CANDIDACY
Not expansion/INVASION like #RUSSIA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversy_regarding_the_legitimacy_of_eastward_NATO_expansion
But I tell you again: Watch out! you are repeating clear #Kremlin NARRATIVE points
It is a candidacy!
So surprising you do not use the RIGHT word?
That is exactly the talking point asked to #Russian #Ambassadors when they go on TV. Look at them!
they are asked to say it's a #NATO #expansion
they never say those joining Nato "ARE ASKING FOR IT"
So I think Russia narratives are not the best narratives to study
Even if proven useful
An agressor "always" play the victim when indeed he just want to cheat & deceive - that's fair play in actual war "games/strategy"
I don't know why, maybe the mustaches, maybe the fact he let #Estonia be #INDEPENDENT
Dzhokhar #Dudayev : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzhokhar_Dudayev
But my first apriori is that his point of view is problematic in that it goes in the direction of someone which cannot be believed on any points - the contrary of a person interested in democracy & parliaments
("Parliament" etymology : to speak)