3 is no slouch! These are highly synergistic decks with a larger number of staples. I would consider many of my decks 3s, regardless of most of them not containing any GCs.
4 is a bit more of the wild west. ANYthing goes here, fast mana, MLD, lockouts, free interaction.
4 is a bit more of the wild west. ANYthing goes here, fast mana, MLD, lockouts, free interaction.
Comments
"Technically I'm a 4 because of MLD, but I don't have fast mana or tutors," is a very concise deck description.
"if you have to ask what the difference between 4 and 5 are, it is a 4"
Cant protect against bad actors but if you genuinely dont know, it is almost impossible to build a cedh deck without learning/knowing what the meta looks like
MTG players (naturally) want to rules lawyer everything in the game but when it comes to brackets you gotta read the vibes.
4s! 😂