He was the one that worked. I'm not Levy out because despite all the fuck-ups, the club is in a better state than when he took it over. I still remember the Sugar years. Even grimmer than now.
We were great under Poch, but even that team was run into the ground by the board - yes stadium was built - but I don’t think Poch was backed properly either.
In an ideal world, of course Poch should have been backed when he talked about the need for a painful rebuild. But I give Levy a pass on that one. Getting the stadium built was crucial to securing the club's long term future. It was the right choice.
I remember when Scholar almost destroyed the club. Every owner can look great when compared to their predecessor - Sugar was a lot better than Scholar for example, doesn’t make them a great owner. Levy has been great for the business side, but terrible for the football team. Why can’t we have both?
Comments