I don't know all the facts. Perhaps Altman and the board have good reason to prefer Altman's lower offer. Perhaps I am wrong about something.
But Altman has a history of moving fast and getting what he wants. To avoid this we need to spot the pattern:
But Altman has a history of moving fast and getting what he wants. To avoid this we need to spot the pattern:
Comments
I am annoyed he has the gall totry and sell a huge business to himself at a below market rate then mock someone for pointing out the absurdity of it.
The feminists have a word for that. It's called gaslighting.
https://x.com/sama/status/1889059531625464090
Why is it in the OpenAI (the non-profit)'s interests to sell one of the leading AI companies at a knockdown price to members of it's own board?
Seems suss. Someone should look into it.
Where am I wrong?
The collective are people are they not?
The problem though is the offer, if credible, does make the $40bn offer not a reflection of fair market value, so it strengthens the case for a higher payout.